Back to Regulatory Developments Homepage
October 1999

Regulatory Developments
Israel
Update Memo

The following report outlines new developments in the past three months and the state of on-going developments.

1. General Background

The internal telecommunications market has been opened and liberalized following the implementation of the Rosenne Report beginning June 1,1999. The tariffs of the historical operator have been revised following the Gronau Committee and are down by 21% (since April, 1999) in preparation to the liberalization; cross subsidy among the services of the historical operator are being abolished. The implementation of the decision opening the telecommunications market for competition since June 1st, 1999 resulted in an intense confrontation among the main players through different means: investments and buy outs; the press; political pressures; appeals to the courts.

The developments since July until middle October are the following:

The main playes are the regulator - the Ministry of Communication that is allocating new licenses for additional services and providers; the Ministry of Finances and specially the Division for Budgeting; the Cable TV companies; the new DBS television company (YES); the historical operator, the Bezeq. The issues are the conditions for the extension of the licenses for the Cable TV companies due to expire between 2002 and 2005 - whether they should pay or not for the extension of their licenses; whether should be separation between the provision of content and ownership of the infrastructure; which additional services should they be allowed to provide and under which conditions: Internet access, telephony and so on.

Cable TV present the main alternative infrastructure for telecommunication services with a local loop in place covering more than 65% of the households in the country (There are currently three cable television operators, each with a monopoly in specific geographic regions, and covering over 90% of the country. About 70% of homes have subscribed to cable television.) It should be noted that the main newspapers chains in the country (Yedioth Aharonot group and Maariv) have a significant presence in the ownership of the Cable TV companies with the consequent leverage this provides them.

Latest developments: The Ministry of Finances (MOF) announced that the value of the extension of the present licenses for the Cable TV companies until the year 2013 are in the order of 950 million to 1.4 billion dollars. Several methods have been employed to calculate - the depreciated value of the Cable TV infrastructure as it appears in the company's books and the value of the latest transaction for the acquisition of one of the regional cable companie when the value set for the indivitudal Cable TV customer was 1,600 dollars. The Ministry of Finances prefers that a new open tender should be published for new cable TV operators allowed also to provid Internet access and telephony. Alternatively, the cable TV companies should be required to pay for the extension of their license. The Minister of Communications in contraposition intend to extend the licenses without payment; the rational is to compensate the Cable TV companies for the introduction of the DBS (multi channel direct broadcasting by satellite) TV services.

The legal counsel of the Ministry of Communications, Dr. Izhar Tal, points out that the economic value of the extension of the license for the Cable TV companies and for the new telecommunication services is much larger than the "damage" (apostrophes in the original) caused by the introduction of DBS services.

Content : The Cable TV companies ask for immediate licenses for the provision of broadband Internet services and telephony over their infrastructure. They oppose the government request for separation between content provision and infrastructure ownership. Meanwhile the ICP arrangement through which the Cable TV companies were allowed to join forces for broadcasting and the acquisition of content was prorrogated for another two months. This until a decision is reached regarding content and intrastructure separation and the issues related to the introduction of the DBS broadcast.

Internet: The small ISP Aquanet announced its intention to lead the small ISP in an appeal to the Supremet Court of Justice in case that the separation between content provision and infrastructures for Cable TV, Internet access and Telephony over cables is not effectivated. They argue that this kind separation has been enforced in the case of the historical telecom operator. The separation enabled a lively market for ISP and content providers to evolve. If no such separation is enforced in the case of the Cable TV companies the investments made by the ISPs so far will be jeopardized.

It should be noticed that Cable TV companies have heavily invested in the latest months in the acquisition of the largest ISP.

Competition between Cable TV and the DBS

The DBS company (multi-channel direct broadcast by satellite) YES is already installing antennas in collective buildings. The antennas are installed freely with a total investment of about 45 million dollars - the antenna costs for the company 400 dollars and the decoder about 200 dollars. Full services should be offered in early 2000.
The latest three months testimonied a continuous confrotantion between the cable TV companies and the DBS.

One of the issues regard content; Cable TV tried to close deals with most international content providers so as to create barriers for the DBS acquisitions in this area. They invested tens of millions of dollars for the rights of broadcasting the main sports leagues, the national selection and both the Warner and Columbia companies. One of the reactions of the DBS company so far has been the acquisition of the most popular soccer team in the country, the Betar Yerushalaim team.

Another issue regards tiering. Cable TV companies didn't offer their customers the alternative of choosing packages of channels at different prices; this although their licenses required them to do so. With the establishment of the DBS company which will offer tiering packages the Cable TV asked to do the same and were forbidden by the Ministry of Communications for at least one to two years. The rational of the Ministry is to provide some advantages to the DBS company (which will offer tiering) until it reaches an adequate customers base that garantees its viability.

The competition between the Cellular Telephony Companies has intensified in the last three months. The third company, Orange-Partner started offering its services at the end of 1998 and has steadily expanded its customer base; this occurred in a large measure at the expense of the historical Cellular operator Pelephone. As a reacion, for the first time, the Pelephone company decided in August in view of the loss of customers to lower its tariffs by 25% and to expand the kind of services offered to the public. The Pelephone CEO, Igal Bar-Iossef, stated that their intention is not to become the cheapest cellular company (like Cellcom) but to be the one which provides most value in relation to the price. Among their marketing strategies: the establishment of a brand for their digital network - Pelephone Next; the Coca-Cola logo in their telephones; special information services for automobiles based on GPS; a special youth campaign to compete with similar campaigns by Orange-Partner and Cellcom.

Historical analysis of the competition in the cellular market: Sever Plotzker, economics editor of the Yedioth Aharonot newspaper defines 4 main causes for the successful competitive environment established in the cellular market in Israel (26.8.1999 , Economy, page 2):

  1. Abolition of the monopoly held by Pelephone without payment of any compensation against the opposition of a very strong company, Motorola that was the owner together with the historical operator, the Bezeq.
  2. The price was set as the unique criteria in the tender for the second cellular operator. Instead of seeking to maximize the payment for the license the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Communications choose the company that showed herself to be able to offer the lowest tariffs and still be profitable, Cellcom.
  3. Avoidance of the government from transforming the cellular market into a source of taxes. In parallel to the publication of tenders for the second and third operators the customs and taxes for importation of cellular telephones were abolished. The government also avoided getting income taxes from the use of the cellular telephone by employees received them from their work places.
  4. The enactment of legislation establishing that the payment for the connection with a cellular telephone should be paid by the initiator of the conversation and not by the owner of the cellular phone. These four decisions established a competitive system that is efficient and fair and provided the high rate of penetration in a very short interval of time. He concludes saying that competition is not enough; the maximun welfare for consumers is obtained by competition and the intervention of a sage public hand.

Environmental issues regarding cellular telephony: Following a public campaign regarding the danger of radiation from cellular telephony antennas and the decision of the Major of Beer Sheva to demolish all antennas established in populous quarters without a license from the municipality a special forum was established by the cellular telephony companies. They announced their commitment to: (1) Complete the licensing process for all the antennas (2) To unifiy the location of the antennas of the different companies in every place where this is possible so as to diminish their number (3) To open information centers where the public may be able to receive any information they need concerning the antennas and cellular telephony (4) To obey the most stringent standards of the World Health Organization.

The intensive competition between the International Telephony companies focused in the last months in the allocation of the customers between the different companies. The historical operator subsidiary Bezeq Beinleumi (Bezeq International) continued to operate the historical access code for international calls 00 and 188. Each of the international operator have been allocated the 012, 013 and 014 codes of access. However the continuing operation of 00 by one of the three internationaloperator garanteed him an unfair advantage as most users automatically used this way of access. The Ministry of Communication decided in middle June 99 to arbitrarily allocate customers who have not so far chosen an specific international operator among the different operators. As a reaction, Bezeq Beinleumi, appealed to the Supreme Court of Justice. In the SCJ (July 18, 1999) the companies reached a compromise that establish that a survey will be carried out among the customers asking them for their preferred company for international calls. The survey will encompass all customers of the fixed and cellular telephony. Beginning May 1st 2000 the customers allocated by the survey will automatically access their chosen company using the 00 interntaional code; they still will be able to access an alternative company if they occasionally prefer by using their special prefix 012, 013 and 014. The Ministry of Communications signed the new general licenses for the companies with a paragraph enacting the obligation for all telecommunications companies to carry out the survey among their customers.

For some time it has been possible to carry out telephone calls between 22:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m. by paying one unit for every 15 minutes for call over all the country; this arrangement facilitated Internet access by users but was abolished. Internet user got organized and put pressure on the historical operator and the Ministry of Communication to provide lower tariffs for Internet access. A initial date for a strike was set up for and then postponed for the 13th of August. The postponement was the result of intense pressures and consultations held out in the framework of the Sciences Committee of the Parliament that invited all the main players for consultations; these included the Bezeq, the Ministry of Communications, the organizers of the strike, the Israel Internet Association (ISOC-IL) and more. The Bezeq proposed a substantial reduction of tariffs but there was no guarantee of agreement for such tariffs by the Ministry of Communications due to its policy against cross-subsidies. The postponed strike did not succeed to involve a majority of the Internet users. However, lately the Bezeq has come with an special tariff reduction proposal aimed at the Internet users.If accepted they may be able to freely use the telephone unlimitedly after 18:00 p.m. until 8:00 a.m. for a payment of less than 50 NIS a month ( about 10 dollars). An additional arrangement to be offered will provide cheaper local access (.24 NIS for half an hour) to three fixed phone numbers after 22:00 p.m. against a monthly fixed payment of 10 NIS. The Bezeq marketing vice-manager Herzl Ozer said he expects the Ministry of Communication to accept the reduction although the General-Director opposed such arrangements in the past.

The GeoCartography Institute published the results of a survey carried out by Profs. Rina and Avi Degani. The survey, carried out in October 1999, over a sample of 1,500 persons of age 8 and more representing the Jewish population, shows that almost 1 among each 5 Israelis surf the Internet at least one hour each week.

The inference from the sample is that the number of Internet users in Israel is 750,000, that is 19.5%. A third of the surfers are children and youngsters aged 8-17 and two-thirds older than 18 ; two thirds of them are male. The average age of the Israeli surfer is 26 and most of them come from well to do, well educated, secular families with an average to good knowledge of English.

Three out of four youngsters aged 12-14 experimented at least once to surf the Internet, that is 75%. In general children and youngsters experiment more, even if they do not stay as permanent users. The rate of experimentation among youngsters and adults alike is 38%. (Yedioth Aharonot, 24 hours, page 11, 3.11.1999).

2. Bi-lateral Agreements

3. Liberalisation

Postal Services: The committee for the review of the postal sector, headed by David Brodet, former Director General of the Ministry of Finance, has turned his recommendations to the Minister of Communications, Benyamin (Fuad) Ben-Eliezer and the Minister of Finance, Avraham (Beiga) Shohat. The main recommendation is fully opening of the postal sector to competition immediately, turning the Postal Authority into a government holding company that will encopass two different companies: one for postal services, and the other for counter and banking services, with the guarantee that the prices to the consumer will remain unchanges. Another recommendation is to decrease the rates of the Postal Authority by 11%: an immediate 6% decrease and the other 5% to be spread over the next 5 years (1% a year) . This is aimed at reducing the existing cross subsidizing among the postal services.
The Postal Authority is well advanced in the planning and implementation of advanced electronic based services including access to the government and electronic/paper alternative delivery interfaces.

4. Copyright and intellectual property rights

The Constitution and Law Committee of the Parliament approved a new law that reinforces protection of intellectual property right is Israel and abroad. The amendments are intended to adapt Isaeli legislation in this area to the World Trade Organization convention, which Israel signed four years ago.

The Ministry of Justice, Yossi Beilin, stated on the same occasion the need that the European Union and the United States put pressure on the Palestinian Authority to wipe out the counterfeit video and compact disc industry. The PA serves as a distribution center for the whole region, including Israel. The dmand was made against a backdrop of the threat of US and European sanctions against Israel for selling counterfeit products.

Moshe Alon, head of the software Calanit group of companies stated (9.8.99) that the situation in Israel has greatly improved. He pointed out as an example the agreement reached lately by Microsoft with the IDF for increased surveillance of the IDFon the use of software packages. He stated that changes in the policy for software licensing are responsible for the confusion; once, when you bought 100 licenses this meaned that even if you had 1,000 employees you could use at the same time up to 100 copies of the software and didn't need a license for each one of your employees. The new policy demand a license for each one of your 1,000 users.

The Minister of Trade and Industry, Ran Cohen, allocated 8 million NIS for a campaign of education, information and publicity regarding the fight on counterfeited software and CD products. The campaign aims at involving the public as an active associate in the fight. One of the tools of the campaign is a video being broadcasted at the main TV channels showing a director of a firm being taken to priso who wonders who among his employees reported to the authorities the fact that he uses counterfeit software.

5. On-going changes in the regulatory framework

6. Media and telecommunication markets


Please note that this report has been prepared under the sole responsibility of the
ESIS II contractors.
It does not necessarily reflect the views of the Commission, nor does the Commission accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of information contained herein.
The ESIS Team of contractors welcomes any additional information or corrections.

 

navigation2.jpg (7319 octets)